Links News

In Western media, publishing fake news about Russia is a good career move… with no consequences — RT Op-ed

Bryan MacDonald
Bryan MacDonald

Bryan MacDonald is an Irish journalist based mostly in Russia.

Preventing “Russian disinformation” within the West has turn out to be a profitable enterprise. However, in actuality, you are much more more likely to encounter deceitful agitprop directed at Russia.

MOSCOW – CP Scott stays a towering determine within the annals of British journalism. Editor of the then “Manchester Guardian” for an astonishing 57 years, he celebrated his paper’s centenary by laying down a set of legendary rules.

“Comment is free, but facts are sacred,” Scott intoned within the missive. Sadly, virtually a hundred years later, information are free and the suitable to unfold disinformation is turning into sacred, so far as his successors are involved. Notably relating to protection of Russia.

Yet one more instance came to visit the New Yr break. Following a few weeks out of the highlight after peddling an clearly fake story about Julian Assange/Paul Manafort conferences in London, Luke Harding reappeared. And he got here armed with his specific model of bulls*** and sloppiness.

Additionally on
Soiled little secret: ‘Think tanks’ are amongst prime culprits in media disinformation disaster

A sensationalist interview with former Soviet spy ‘Viktor Suvorov’ was filled with fragile fact-checking and downright stupidity. For example, presenting a pensioner, who defected from a totally different nation virtually 40 years in the past, as an authority on how Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin operates as we speak stretched credulity. And the piece was additionally riddled with factual errors, as well.

As an example, Harding claimed Suvorov’s 1980’s ebook “Icebreaker” now “has broad acceptance among historians;” a tome which insists “Stalin had been secretly plotting an offensive against Hitler’s Germany” however first he “wanted Hitler to destroy democracy in Europe, in the manner of an icebreaker, thereby clearing the way for world communism.” In different phrases, not the model you discovered at college.

Besides, shock, shock, this assertion on Suvorov’s e-book is not true. As one scholar identified, whereas demanding a correction from Harding, it is extra correct to say the other is the case. Certainly, the scholar referenced, “Suvorov’s argument was rapidly countered by much of the established Russian historical community,” together with Dmitry Volkogonov, “with the support of Western historians.”

Specialist in speciousness

We have been right here earlier than with Harding. He is repeatedly weaved fantastical tales about Russia, and different topics, for years. However, because the legendary ex-Moscow hack Mark Ames observes “literally nothing Harding publishes, no matter how demonstrably false and reckless, will ever hurt his journalism career. He’s a Made Man.”

Guardian hack Luke Harding was caught plagiarizing me, @yashalevine & others—and it had zero impact on his career development. If his newest “scoop” on Manafort/Assange is debunked, there shall be zero consequences. Most of us nonetheless can’t absolutely grasp this

— Mark Ames (@MarkAmesExiled) November 27, 2018

And, whereas he is an particularly blatant instance, Harding is not alone on this. As a result of on the Russia beat, it appears Western journalists can just about get away with any transgressions, with out struggling career injury. As an alternative, paradoxically, it typically appears to even result in skilled development.

At present, you hear a lot of hysteria regarding “Russian disinformation” within the West, however little or nothing, in mainstream media, on “disinformation about Russia,” one thing this author has tried to cowl in recent times. And it is a lonely beat.

Certainly, because the Canadian educational Paul Robinson rightly notes, whereas “there’s a huge army of well-funded institutions and individuals now devoted to uncovering and countering ‘Russian disinformation,’ there seems to be little or no accountability for the false stories produced by Western sources (on Russia).”

And the examples are legion. With even probably the most heinous fakes failing to quantity to any kind of setback for his or her promoters. Which suggests editors are very happy to indulge the apply, as a result of in any case it is solely Russia and everybody is aware of Russia is “bad.”

Additionally on
Democratic operative who bragged about Russian bot ‘false flag’ points contradiction-filled denial

Listed here are a few chosen lowlights…

  • Again in October 2015, with East/West tensions operating excessive because of the Ukrainian conflict and Moscow’s reabsorption of Crimea, Politico dropped a bombshell. Its author Ben Judah alleged that Vladimir Putin provided Poland the chance to divide Ukraine up between Warsaw & Moscow. However, all of us breathed extra simply after the supply publicly disowned the story and the editor was proven to have failed to interact in even primary fact-checking. Nevertheless, it was solely a minor inconvenience for the writer, who later fell into a Hudson Institute gig and loads of CNN punditry.
  • The next spring noticed extra ludicrous hackery. The Day by day Telegraph reported that “Vladimir Putin’s girlfriend has given birth.” In Switzerland, no much less. The story was by no means corroborated by any Russian (or some other) outlet & made no sense for numerous causes. The reporter involved at present enjoys the place of a senior overseas correspondent with the newspaper.
  • In the summer time of 2015, the Occasions of London ran a ridiculous declare that Moscow was serving to East Ukrainian rebels to make a “dirty bomb” to be used of their battle with Kiev. The only supply was Ukraine’s SBU (successor to the KGB in Ukraine), which clearly had pores and skin within the recreation and is not precisely recognized for straight capturing. Anyway, no chemical weapons have been utilized in Donbass, fortunately, however we additionally have not seen a retraction. In the meantime, the rookie reporter concerned now has a plum position at George Soros’ Open Society and guests to his Twitter account are first greeted with “a short history of Russian disinfo.” Which quantities to Alanis Morissette ranges of irony.
  • In Might of the identical yr, The Day by day Beast warned how Russia would launch a full scale invasion of Ukraine that summer time. It did not occur, however it wasn’t an obstacle for the 2 reporters concerned. One was later employed by CNN as a contracted “Russia expert,” regardless of the very fact he is by no means been to Russia and may’t converse Russian. The opposite went on to work for US state broadcaster RFE/RL, the place a part of his duties have been selectively quoting elements of RT opinion items in makes an attempt to label them unfaithful or deceptive.

Additionally on
Capitalize on ‘Russian meddling’ like a professional: Fake it in state elections, write report for Senate

  • In December 2017, Newsweek surprised its readers by saying “Putin is preparing for World War Three,” subtitled “yeah, that’s bad” for causes recognized solely to its editors. The piece, written by the journal’s Moscow correspondent, was based mostly on two nameless British sources, who might or might not exist, and a Russian opposition rent-a-gob with zero entry to Putin’s circle. The writer stays Newsweek’s Moscow Bureau Chief.
  • Virtually concurrently, Overseas Coverage’s reporter within the capital wrote a lengthy complain about issues she had buying contacts related with the Russian authorities. She appropriately identified that the Russian capital’s Western “hack pack” are shunned by highly effective individuals right here. Nevertheless, she failed to elucidate why (it is just because they are not taken critically and it is extensively believed they do not cowl Russia pretty). In the top, the entire thing blew up in her face when Russian Overseas Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova identified that she by no means tried to contact her division and did not attend a single briefing over a seven month interval, post-accreditation. Quickly after, our hero was employed by the Washington Submit. 
  • A couple of months later, Ben Nimmo, a lobbyist at NATO’s Atlantic Council adjunct and a former press officer for the army alliance, labeled Twitter consumer Ian Shilling a “Russian troll.” Quickly after, Shilling turned up on UK TV to show he was a actual British individual, who merely opposes London’s overseas coverage. Nimmo hasn’t apologized and continues to be cited as an “expert on Russian disinformation” by mainstream media retailers, who not often, if ever, inform readers of his NATO ties. Or his newer work with “Integrity Initiative,” a UK government-funded “info wars” venture.

Additionally on
Skripal spin docs: Paperwork hyperlink UK govt-funded Integrity Initiative to anti-Russia narrative

  • Across the similar time, the infamous “Gerasimov Doctrine” fake took flight among the many Western “Russia Watcher” group. Coined by Mark Galeotti, a British pundit, the trope was based mostly on a poor translation of a 2013 Russian-language essay and pushed by the likes of Molly McKew and CNN’s Jim Sciutto. In the meantime, critical Russia analysts tried to elucidate such a doc did not exist and have been largely ignored. The Monetary Occasions ought to have listened as a result of its Overseas Desk made fools out of themselves by way of a wordy article titled “Valery Gerasimov, the general with a doctrine for Russia.” The writer is nonetheless in situ as Moscow bureau chief.
  • This previous November, the Occasions of London alleged that the Kremlin is operating 75,000 informants in London. The determine was based mostly on knowledge from the Henry Jackson Society, a neoconservative foyer group. It later turned out that the ‘analysis’ concerned simply 16 interviews. The correspondent behind the items appears to focus on hysterical, and factually unfastened, splashes regarding Russia. Presumably this is what his editors need.

Quite a few different examples exist however extra are hardly wanted to point out how there appears to be no penalty for getting Russia improper in Western media. And, quite the opposite, it is hardly a conspiracy principle to recommend it is actively inspired.

Which suggests, in fact, disinformation about Russia is much more widespread, organized and influential than notional “Russian disinformation.” Notably on social networks, however prevalent too in supposedly “respectable” media.

READ MORE: The one ‘Russian bots’ to meddle in US elections belonged to Democrat-linked ‘experts’

However, do not maintain your breath ready for the standard assume tank “info war” chancers to difficulty stories, dripping with condemnation. As a result of this is not about delivering fact within the news, it is about retaining management of the narrative.

Assume your folks would have an interest? Share this story!

The statements, views and opinions expressed on this column are solely these of the writer and don’t essentially characterize these of RT.